← IELTS Writing Grader

Case study — Ví dụ kết quả chấm

Case studies — Sample grading results

Cập nhật: 2 tháng 7, 2026

Dưới đây là ví dụ thật về giao diện kết quả chấm trên 2 bài mẫu (Task 1 và Task 2). Đây là bản minh họa — kết quả của bạn sẽ khác tùy nội dung bài viết.

Live samples of the grading UI on two demo essays (Task 1 and Task 2). Your results will vary based on your essay.

Ảnh chụp màn hình được render trực tiếp từ giao diện chấm bài — không chỉnh sửa Photoshop.

Screenshots are rendered from the live grading UI — not edited mockups.

Ví dụ 1

Task 1 — Bar chart (Overall 6.5)

Task 1 — Bar chart (Overall 6.5)

Bài mô tả biểu đồ có overview rõ và số liệu chính xác. Điểm mạnh ở Task Achievement (7.0); feedback gợi ý thêm một câu phân tích xu hướng.

Chart summary with a clear overview and accurate figures. Strong Task Achievement (7.0); feedback suggests one more trend sentence.

Đề bài

The chart below shows the percentage of men and women in three age groups who were employed in one country in 2023.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

  • Overview và nhóm số liệu theo độ tuổi
  • Gợi ý từ vựng học thuật thay thế
  • Rewrite giữ nguyên cấu trúc, chỉnh câu mở và thêm insight
  • Overview and age-group data grouping
  • Academic vocabulary suggestions
  • Rewrite keeps structure, improves opening and insight

Biểu đồ trong đề

Employment rates by age group and gender (2023)020406080100Percentage employed (%)88%76%25–3485%70%35–5465%52%55–64
MenWomen
ieltswritinggrader.com/app

Evaluation results — IELTS Academic Task 1

Scored via GPT-4o. Bands use IELTS half-band increments (.0 / .5).

Band scores

Overall

6.5

TR

7.0

Task Achievement

CC

6.5

Coherence & Cohesion

LR

6.5

Lexical Resource

GRA

6.5

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Điểm Task 1 — TA nổi bật 7.0

Task 1 scores — TA stands out at 7.0

ieltswritinggrader.com/app

1. Detailed criterion analysis

1. Task Achievement — Score: 7.0

Overview quality::

Clear overview identifies the main trend (men higher in all groups) and mentions highest/lowest points. Good Band 7 overview.

Information grouping::

Data is grouped by age bracket with direct comparisons — effective for Task 1.

What works (quote + why)::

- "men had higher employment than women in all age groups" — accurate global summary. - Percentages are reported with sensible rounding.

What fails (quote + what)::

- No mention of the *gap* narrowing or widening between age groups (if visible in the chart) — add one analytical sentence if the data supports it.

2. Coherence and Cohesion — Score: 6.5

Data-sentence quality::

Body paragraphs follow age order logically. Linking is adequate ("while", "versus").

3. Lexical Resource — Score: 6.5…

Nhận xét Task Achievement và overview

Task Achievement and overview feedback

ieltswritinggrader.com/app

2. Edited rewrite (vs. your original essay)

Red strikethrough = removed or incorrect wording. Blue bold = new or corrected text.

Your original essay

The bar chart compares employment rates of males and females in three age groups in 2023.

Overall, men had higher employment than women in all age groups. The highest employment was among men aged 25-34 at about 88%, while the lowest was women aged 55-64 at roughly 52%.

In the 25-34 group, around 88% of men worked compared with 76% of women. For 35-54, the figures were 85% and 70%. In the oldest group, 65% of men were employed versus 52% of women.

Edited rewrite

The bar chart illustrates compares employment rates of males and females for men and women in three age groups in 2023.

Overall, men had higher employment than women in all age groups. The highest employment was among men aged 25-34 at about 88%, while the lowest was women aged 55-64 at roughly 52%. The gender gap appears widest in the middle-age group.

In the 25-34 group, around 88% of men worked compared with 76% of women. For 35-54, the figures were 85% and 70%. In the oldest group, 65% of men were employed versus 52% of women.

Rewrite ngắn gọn cho Task 1

Concise Task 1 rewrite

Ví dụ 2

Task 2 — Discuss both views (Overall 6.0)

Task 2 — Discuss both views (Overall 6.0)

Bài luận ngắn ~180 từ, đủ 4 đoạn nhưng ví dụ còn đơn giản. Hệ thống chấm Overall 6.0, chỉ rõ TR/CC/LR/GRA và gợi ý nâng band qua phân tích từng tiêu chí.

A short ~180-word essay with clear structure but weak examples. Overall 6.0 with criterion-by-criterion feedback.

Đề bài

Some people believe that university students should be allowed to study whatever they like. Others think they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as science and technology. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Discuss both views on whether university students should choose any subject or only future-useful subjects.

  • Điểm Overall + 4 tiêu chí (TR, CC, LR, GRA) theo bước 0.5 IELTS
  • Phân tích có trích dẫn câu trong bài («What works» / «What fails»)
  • Bản rewrite song song: gạch đỏ phần yếu, in đậm xanh phần nâng band
  • Overall + four criteria in half-band steps
  • Quoted evidence from the essay
  • Side-by-side rewrite with track changes
ieltswritinggrader.com/app

Evaluation results — IELTS Academic Task 2

Scored via GPT-4o. Bands use IELTS half-band increments (.0 / .5).

Band scores

Overall

6.0

TR

6.0

Task Response

CC

6.0

Coherence & Cohesion

LR

6.0

Lexical Resource

GRA

5.5

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Bảng điểm band — Overall và 4 tiêu chí

Band score card — overall and four criteria

ieltswritinggrader.com/app

1. Detailed criterion analysis

1. Task Response — Score: 6.0

Core evaluation::

You address both views and state a clear opinion. The position is understandable but underdeveloped — examples are personal and brief rather than analytical.

What works (quote + why)::

- "Discuss both views and give your own opinion" is covered with a short intro, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. - "In my opinion, students should study what they like but universities should also advise them" gives a balanced stance.

What fails (quote + what)::

- "For example, my friend studied art" — anecdotal; examiners expect broader societal examples. - The counter-argument ("If everyone studies art, there will be no engineers") is simplistic; needs nuance about choice vs. labour-market needs.

2. Coherence and Cohesion — Score: 6.0…

Phân tích chi tiết theo tiêu chí (trích Task Response)

Detailed criterion analysis (Task Response excerpt)

ieltswritinggrader.com/app

2. Edited rewrite (vs. your original essay)

Red strikethrough = removed or incorrect wording. Blue bold = new or corrected text.

Your original essay

Nowadays, many students go to university. Some people think students can study anything they want. Other people say they should only study useful subjects like science.

On one hand, when students choose subjects they like, they are more motivated. For example, my friend studied art and she was very happy. Also, society needs different jobs, not only science.

On the other hand, subjects like technology are important for the future. If everyone studies art, there will be no engineers. Companies need people who can work with computers.

In my opinion, students should study what they like but universities should also advise them about jobs. This is the best way for both students and society.

Edited rewrite

Nowadays, many students go to university. University enrolment has grown worldwide, and debate continues over how much freedom students should have when choosing a major. Some people think students can study anything they want. Other people say they should only study useful subjects like science. Some argue that learners should follow their interests, while others insist on career-oriented fields such as science and technology.

On one hand, when students choose subjects they like, they are more motivated. For example, my friend studied art and she was very happy. When students pursue intrinsically interesting fields, they often sustain effort through demanding coursework. Also, society needs different jobs, not only science.

On the other hand, subjects like technology are important for the future. If everyone studies art, there will be no engineers. Economies still require specialists in engineering, healthcare, and data science, so completely ignoring labour-market needs would be unrealistic. Companies need people who can work with computers.

In my opinion, students should study what they like but universities should also advise them about jobs. Ideally, institutions should allow choice while offering structured career guidance. This is the best way for both students and society.

So sánh bài gốc và bản chỉnh sửa

Original essay vs. edited rewrite

Chấm thử bài của bạn

Grade your essay

IELTS Writing Grader

Chấm bài IELTS Academic Writing online — Task 1 & Task 2Grade IELTS Academic Writing online — Task 1 & Task 2

Chấm bài·Lịch sử·Case study·Pháp lý·Hỗ trợ·Chính sách bảo mật·Điều khoản·Hoàn tiền